Fooled by Randomness: How Chance Affects Our Lives and Markets - Download EPUB by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Nassim Taleb Fooled by Randomness EPUB Download: A Review
If you are looking for a book that will challenge your assumptions about the world and make you think differently about how you make decisions, then you might want to download Fooled by Randomness by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. This book is the first in Taleb's landmark Incerto series, which explores the concepts of uncertainty, probability, risk, and human error in various domains. In this article, we will review Fooled by Randomness and highlight some of its main points and insights.
nassim taleb fooled by randomness epub download
Introduction
In Fooled by Randomness, Taleb argues that we often fail to recognize the role of chance and randomness in our lives and in the markets. We tend to attribute our successes and failures to our skills, intelligence, or strategies, while ignoring the impact of luck, coincidence, or external factors. We also tend to overestimate our ability to predict and control the future, while underestimating the possibility of rare and unpredictable events. As a result, we are prone to various cognitive biases and errors that can lead us to make poor decisions and suffer from emotional stress.
Who is Nassim Taleb?
Nassim Nicholas Taleb is a Lebanese-American author, philosopher, statistician, trader, and professor. He has a PhD in management science from the University of Paris and has taught at several universities, including New York University and Oxford University. He is best known for his books on uncertainty and risk, such as The Black Swan, Antifragile, The Bed of Procrustes, and Skin in the Game. He is also the founder of Universa Investments, a hedge fund that specializes in tail risk protection.
What is Fooled by Randomness about?
Fooled by Randomness is a book that explores the hidden role of chance in life and in the markets. It draws on examples from various fields, such as finance, psychology, philosophy, science, history, and literature, to illustrate how randomness affects our perception, judgment, and decision-making. It also offers some practical advice on how to cope with uncertainty and randomness in a complex and unpredictable world.
Why should you read Fooled by Randomness?
You should read Fooled by Randomness if you want to:
Learn how to avoid common pitfalls and biases that can cloud your thinking and harm your performance.
Understand how to distinguish between skill and luck, signal and noise, causation and correlation.
Discover how to embrace uncertainty and randomness as sources of opportunity and learning.
Develop a more realistic and humble attitude towards your knowledge and abilities.
Enjoy a witty and entertaining style of writing that combines anecdotes, stories, jokes, and insights.
Main Points of Fooled by Randomness
In this section, we will summarize some of the main points and ideas that Taleb presents in Fooled by Randomness. We will also provide some quotes from the book to illustrate his arguments.
The role of chance in life and markets
One of the main themes of Fooled by Randomness is that chance and randomness play a much bigger role in our lives and in the markets than we usually think. Taleb argues that we live in a highly complex and nonlinear world, where small changes can have large consequences, and where outcomes are often determined by factors that are beyond our control or understanding. He also claims that we tend to underestimate the frequency and magnitude of rare and extreme events, which he calls "black swans". These events can have a disproportionate impact on our lives and on the markets, and can render our predictions and models useless.
Taleb uses the example of the financial markets to illustrate how randomness can affect our performance and perception. He compares two types of traders: the "noise trader" and the "long-term investor". The noise trader is someone who trades frequently and reacts to short-term fluctuations in the market. The long-term investor is someone who trades infrequently and focuses on the long-term trends and fundamentals. Taleb argues that the noise trader is more likely to be fooled by randomness than the long-term investor, because he is more exposed to the volatility and noise of the market, and because he is more likely to confuse luck with skill. The noise trader may experience temporary success or failure due to random factors, but he may not realize that his results are not indicative of his true abilities or strategies. The long-term investor, on the other hand, is more likely to filter out the noise and focus on the signal, and to recognize that his results are subject to uncertainty and variability.
Taleb also points out that we tend to judge people's performance based on their outcomes, rather than their processes. We tend to reward or punish people for their results, without considering how much luck or randomness was involved in their success or failure. We also tend to ignore the role of survivorship bias, which is the tendency to focus on the winners who survived a selection process, while ignoring the losers who did not. For example, we may admire a successful entrepreneur who made a fortune by taking a risky venture, while ignoring the many others who took similar risks but failed. We may also overlook the fact that some people may have succeeded despite their mistakes, while others may have failed despite their efforts.
Some quotes from the book on this topic are:
"One cannot judge a performance in any given field (war, politics, medicine, investments) by the results, but by the costs of the alternative (i.e., if history played out in a different way). Such substitute courses of events are called alternative histories. Clearly the quality of a decision cannot be solely judged based on its outcome, but such a point seems to be voiced only by people who fail (those who succeed attribute their success to the quality of their decision)."
"It is as if there were two planets: the one in which we actually live and the one, considerably more deterministic, on which people are convinced we live. It is as simple as that: Past events will always look less random than they were (it is called the hindsight bias). I would listen to someone's discussion of his own past realizing that much of what he was saying was just backfit explanations concocted ex post by his deluded mind."
"Clearly, investors are not being paid for risk taking per se; they are being paid for taking some risks but not others; they are being paid for being exposed to some rare events but not others; they are being paid for being exposed to some nonlinearities but not others."
The problem of hindsight bias
Hindsight bias is the tendency to believe, after an event has occurred, that we knew it was going to happen or that it was inevitable. It is also known as the "I-knew-it-all-along" effect. Hindsight bias can lead us to overestimate our ability to predict or explain past events, and to underestimate the role of chance or randomness in them. It can also make us less willing to learn from our mistakes or to revise our beliefs.
The illusion of control
The illusion of control is the tendency to believe that we have more influence or control over events than we actually do. It is also known as the "illusion of mastery". The illusion of control can lead us to overestimate our skills, intelligence, or strategies, and to underestimate the role of luck, coincidence, or external factors. It can also make us more confident and optimistic than we should be.
Taleb argues that the illusion of control is one of the main sources of our overconfidence. He claims that we tend to attribute our successes to our own actions, while attributing our failures to external causes. He also claims that we tend to confuse correlation with causation, and to assume that we can manipulate or predict outcomes by manipulating or predicting inputs. He also claims that we tend to ignore the role of feedback loops, which are situations where our actions can affect the environment, which in turn can affect our actions.
Taleb uses the example of gambling to illustrate how the illusion of control can affect our behavior and perception. He compares two types of gamblers: the "lucky fool" and the "stoic". The lucky fool is someone who believes that he can influence or predict the outcome of a game of chance by using some tricks or rituals. The stoic is someone who accepts that he has no control over the outcome of a game of chance and plays according to the odds. Taleb argues that the lucky fool is more likely to be fooled by randomness than the stoic, because he is more susceptible to the gambler's fallacy, which is the tendency to believe that past outcomes can affect future outcomes. The lucky fool may also experience more emotional highs and lows than the stoic, because he is more attached to his results.
Some quotes from the book on this topic are:
"We are faulty in detecting randomness because we are too good at detecting patterns. We are pattern machines. We detect patterns even when there are none."
"The problem with experts is that they do not know what they do not know."
"The human mind suffers from three ailments as it comes into contact with history, what I call the triplet of opacity. They are: a) The illusion of understanding, or how everyone thinks he knows what is going on in a world that is more complicated (or random) than he realizes; b) The retrospective distortion, or how we can assess matters only after the fact, as if they were in a rearview mirror (history seems clearer and more organized in history books than in empirical reality); and c) The overvaluation of factual information and the handicap of authoritative and learned people."
The survivorship bias
Survivorship bias is the tendency to focus on the survivors who made it through a selection process, while ignoring the non-survivors who did not. It is also known as the "survival of the fittest" fallacy. Survivorship bias can lead us to overestimate the probability or frequency of success, and to underestimate the role of chance or randomness in it. It can also make us less aware of the risks or costs involved in achieving success.
Taleb argues that survivorship bias is one of the main sources of our misperception of reality. He claims that we tend to select and analyze data that confirm our beliefs or expectations, while ignoring or discarding data that contradict them. He also claims that we tend to look for successful examples or role models that support our aspirations or goals, while overlooking unsuccessful examples or counterexamples that challenge them. He also claims that we tend to generalize from specific cases or anecdotes to universal rules or principles.
the silent grave is more likely to be ignored or forgotten than the loud winner, because he does not attract attention or publicity. The loud winner, on the other hand, is more likely to be celebrated and admired than the silent grave, because he represents a success story or a role model. Taleb argues that this creates a distorted picture of reality, where we only see the winners and not the losers, and where we assume that success is more common and more predictable than it actually is. He also argues that this can lead us to take excessive risks or to follow bad advice, without considering the possibility of failure or the role of luck.
Some quotes from the book on this topic are:
"We favor the visible, the embedded, the personal, the narrated, and the tangible; we scorn the abstract. Everything good (aesthetics, ethics) and wrong (Fooled by Randomness) with us seems to flow from it."
"The problem with information is not that it is diverting and generally useless, but that it is toxic."
"Mild success can be explainable by skills and labor. Wild success is attributable to variance."
The limits of human knowledge and rationality
Another main theme of Fooled by Randomness is that human knowledge and rationality are limited and flawed. Taleb argues that we often overestimate our ability to understand and explain the world, and that we often underestimate our ignorance and uncertainty. He also argues that we often rely on faulty or incomplete models and theories that do not capture the complexity and randomness of reality. He also argues that we often fall prey to various logical fallacies and cognitive biases that impair our reasoning and judgment.
Taleb introduces three concepts that illustrate the limits of human knowledge and rationality: the black swan problem, the ludic fallacy, and the narrative fallacy. These concepts are explained in more detail in his later book The Black Swan, but they are also mentioned in Fooled by Randomness.
The black swan problem
The black swan problem is the problem of predicting or explaining rare and unpredictable events that have a huge impact on history or society. These events are called black swans because they are unexpected and surprising, like finding a black swan in a world where all swans are assumed to be white. Taleb argues that black swans are inevitable and unavoidable in a complex and nonlinear world, where small causes can have large effects, and where outcomes are determined by factors that are unknown or unknowable. He also argues that black swans are often retrospectively rationalized or explained away by experts or historians, who try to fit them into existing models or theories.
Taleb uses the example of 9/11 to illustrate how a black swan can affect our lives and our perception. He argues that 9/11 was a black swan event because it was highly improbable and unpredictable, because it had a huge impact on the world, and because it changed our understanding of reality. He also argues that 9/11 was retrospectively explained by various experts or analysts, who tried to find patterns or causes for it, while ignoring the role of chance or randomness in it.
Some quotes from the book on this topic are:
the past can convincingly point to its possibility. Second, it carries an extreme impact. Third, in spite of its outlier status, human nature makes us concoct explanations for its occurrence after the fact, making it explainable and predictable."
"We are not natural skeptics; we become skeptics after being duped by randomness."
"The inability to predict outliers implies the inability to predict the course of history."
The ludic fallacy
The ludic fallacy is the fallacy of assuming that the rules and probabilities of games or models apply to real life situations. It is also known as the "casino fallacy". The ludic fallacy can lead us to underestimate the complexity and randomness of reality, and to overestimate our ability to calculate or control risks. It can also make us more vulnerable to black swans, which are events that do not follow the rules or probabilities of games or models.
Taleb argues that the ludic fallacy is one of the main sources of our miscalculation of risks. He claims that we tend to rely on mathematical models or theories that are based on idealized or simplified assumptions, such as normal distributions, independence, stationarity, or linearity. He also claims that we tend to ignore or neglect the role of human factors, such as emotions, biases, errors, or frauds. He also claims that we tend to confuse the map with the territory, and to mistake our representations of reality for reality itself.
Taleb uses the example of Russian roulette to illustrate how the ludic fallacy can affect our behavior and perception. He compares two types of players: the "ludic player" and the "real player". The ludic player is someone who plays Russian roulette according to the rules and probabilities of a game. The real player is someone who plays Russian roulette according to the realities and consequences of life. Taleb argues that the ludic player is more likely to be fooled by randomness than the real player, because he is more exposed to the risks and uncertainties of reality, and because he is more likely to ignore or disregard them.
Some quotes from the book on this topic are:
"The ludic fallacy (ludus means game in Latin) is a version of this problem: it is a mistake to think that one can apply probability theory (or any scientific method) without some understanding of reality."
"The problem with these methods is that they are designed for games where one knows all possible outcomes in advance (like dice), not for real life where one does not know what tomorrow's invention will be."
"The map is not the territory."
The narrative fallacy
the fallacy of creating coherent and causal stories or explanations for random or complex events. It is also known as the "storytelling bias". The narrative fallacy can lead us to oversimplify and distort reality, and to impose order and meaning where there is none. It can also make us more confident and certain than we should be.
Taleb argues that the narrative fallacy is one of the main sources of our illusion of understanding. He claims that we tend to construct narratives and explanations for past events that make them seem more predictable and understandable than they were. He also claims that we tend to select and emphasize data that fit our narratives and explanations, while ignoring or discarding data that do not. He also claims that we tend to use hindsight bias and confirmation bias to support our narratives and explanations.
Taleb uses the example of history to illustrate how the narrative fallacy can affect our perception and judgment. He compares two types of historians: the "narrative historian" and the "skeptical historian". The narrative historian is someone who writes history as a coherent and causal story, where events are linked by causes and effects, and where patterns and trends are identified and explained. The skeptical historian is someone who writes history as a collection of facts, where events are separated by randomness and uncertainty, and where patterns and trends are questioned and challenged. Taleb argues that the narrative historian is more likely to be fooled by randomness than the skeptical historian, because he is more susceptible to the hindsight bias, the confirmation bias, and the narrative fallacy.
Some quotes from the book on this topic are:
"The narrative fallacy addresses our limited ability to look at sequences of facts without weaving an explanation into them, or, equivalently, forcing a logical link, an arrow of relationship upon them."
"History is useful for the thrill of knowing the past, and for the narrative (indeed), provided it remains a harmless narrative."
"History does not crawl, it jumps."
The ways to deal with uncertainty and randomness
In Fooled by Randomness, Taleb does not only criticize our errors and biases in dealing with uncertainty and randomness, b